Difference between revisions of "Admiral Archer (Kelvin)"
From Trekipedia
m |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{{ImageInfoBox2|name=Archer}} | {{ImageInfoBox2|name=Archer}} | ||
− | {{TableRow|title=Species|data=[[Humans|Human]]}} | + | {{TableRow|title=Species|data=[[Humans (Kelvin)|Human]]}} |
− | {{ | + | {{Ad|AmazonKelvinBD}} |
|}</div> | |}</div> | ||
− | Admiral Archer’s prized [[ | + | {{BannerKelvin}} |
+ | Admiral Archer’s prized [[beagle]] was lost in a tragic transporter accident some time prior to [[2250s (Kelvin)#2258|2258]].<ref name="ST11"/><ref name="Archer"/> | ||
{{References}} | {{References}} | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
− | <ref name="ST11"> | + | <ref name="ST11">{{RefST11}}</ref> |
− | <ref name="Archer">It seems unlikely that Admiral Archer was the same person as [[ | + | <ref name="Archer">It seems unlikely that Admiral Archer was the same person as [[Jonathan Archer]], who died in [[2245]] in the Prime Timeline; given that it was implied that Admiral Archer was still alive in 2258; it’s possible that the two may have been related.</ref> |
</references> | </references> | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Archer, Admiral (Kelvin)}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Archer, Admiral (Kelvin)}} | ||
[[Category:Library]] | [[Category:Library]] | ||
[[Category:People]] | [[Category:People]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Humanoids]] | ||
[[Category:Humans]] | [[Category:Humans]] | ||
[[Category:Federation Citizens]] | [[Category:Federation Citizens]] |
Latest revision as of 04:58, 28 August 2023
Admiral Archer’s prized beagle was lost in a tragic transporter accident some time prior to 2258.[1][2]
Notes and References
- ↑ Abrams, J.J. & Damon Lindelof (Producers). Star Trek. Directed by J.J. Abrams. Written by Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman. Paramount Pictures. 8 May 2009.
- ↑ It seems unlikely that Admiral Archer was the same person as Jonathan Archer, who died in 2245 in the Prime Timeline; given that it was implied that Admiral Archer was still alive in 2258; it’s possible that the two may have been related.